Author (Person) | Ciciora, Alice |
---|---|
Series Title | Comparative European Politics |
Series Details | Vol.16, No.2, March 2018, p330-349 |
Publication Date | March 2018 |
ISSN | 1472-4790 (print) 1740-388X (online) |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: This article presents a typology of Muslim councils. The typology identifies two central ways in which these bodies vary: how they are formed (by the government or by the Muslim community) and who can be a member (universal or restricted by sect, ethnicity or national origin). The central claim in this article is that the nature of Muslim council present in a country is indicative of the extent to which Muslims will be incorporated into the policy-making process. Councils that condition representation on membership in a given sect or ethnic heritage are overall less likely to be incorporated in the policy-making process. Compared with those councils created by the Muslim community and elevated to official status, councils created by the state are also less likely to be a part of the policy-making process. In addition, when state-created councils are consulted, it is likely to be perfunctory rather than a meaningful discussion. In order to provide an empirical test to see what relationship, if any, exists between policy outcomes and the type of council in a given country, I look at the process of creating Muslim dress policy in Austria, France and the Netherlands. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/cep.2016.23 |
Subject Categories | Values and Beliefs |
Countries / Regions | Austria, Europe, France, Netherlands |