Author (Person) | Coskun, Vahap |
---|---|
Series Title | Insight Turkey |
Series Details | Vol.12, No.4, October 2010, p43-68 |
Publication Date | October 2010 |
ISSN | 1302-177X |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Turkey is moving toward achieving an ever-greater level of democracy by removing the remnants of restrictive and paternalistic administrative structures. The judiciary in Turkey has been one of the most influential instruments of state power in maintaining these structures. In the wake of the recently passed constitutional amendments, the question of whether the current government is trying to create a docile judiciary for its political purposes has been widely circulated. However, such questioning misses one of the most crucial motivators of the much needed reform package, i.e., the undemocratic record of the Turkish judiciary. The Turkish judiciary has traditionally considered itself as one of the guardians of the Turkish republic alongside the military. It has consistently delivered undemocratic decisions in the name of protecting the state. This article focuses on many examples of restrictive and paternalistic judiciary decisions in order to highlight the judiciary’s undemocratic role in the Turkish political system. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.insightturkey.com/ |
Countries / Regions | Turkey |