Author (Person) | van Middelaar, Luuk |
---|---|
Series Title | Journal of Common Market Studies |
Series Details | Vol.54, No.3, May 2016, p495–507 |
Publication Date | May 2016 |
ISSN | 0021-9886 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: A crisis can reveal characteristics of a political order which in normal times remain invisible. Two such moments of clarification hit European Union (EU) countries in quick succession. The euro crisis tested the resolve of leaders and peoples to save the single currency. In both cases we saw a ‘return of politics’. Geopolitical interests trumped economic ones; a need for government (and not just governance) made itself felt; European politics became more salient and intertwined with domestic politics. In the turmoil, notwithstanding calls for a big leap toward greater unity, the European Union also showed its dynamic in-between nature. The public perceives this politicisation perfectly, hence both its disenchantment and the calls for more democracy. EU integration, after ‘permissive consensus’ and ‘constraining dissensus’, could be moving to the era of binding dissensus. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12336 |
Subject Categories | Politics and International Relations |
Countries / Regions | Central Europe, Europe, Ukraine |