Author (Person) | Matthijs, Matthias, McNamara, Kathleen R. |
---|---|
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Series Title | Journal of European Integration |
Series Details | Volume 37, Number 2, Pages 229-245 |
Publication Date | February 2015 |
ISSN | 0703-6337 |
Content Type | Journal Article |
Abstract: Of the multiple narratives EU policymakers could have chosen at the onset of the euro crisis, why did austerity and structural reform win out over other plausible cures for member states’ problems? Arguably, sovereign debt pooling or more federalized economic governance would have been a solution to member states’ national deficits and competitiveness woes. To understand this puzzle, we draw on the sociology of knowledge literature. We argue that the response to the euro crisis was heavily informed by broader social logics that constructed the problem and the solution heavily toward ordoliberal and neoliberal ideas. Mapping the fate of the Eurobond proposals allows us to trace the complex entanglement of economic policy-making and parse out the ways in which social realities are shaped to make particular policy choices seem inevitable, even as they are themselves the product of social processes. Further information: This journal article is part of a Special Issue titled Making Europe: The Sociology of Knowledge Meets European Integration. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.990137 |
Subject Categories | Economic and Financial Affairs |
Subject Tags | Economic Governance | Situation |
International Organisations | European Union [EU] |