Supranational governance or national business-as-usual? The national administration of EU Structural Funds in The Netherlands and Denmark

The partnership principle in EU cohesion policy was introduced in order to involve subnational authorities and interest organizations in policy formulation and implementation. In this article the authors examine how the member states have reacted to this call for a new way of making public policy.

The authors argue that the multi-level governance literature and the critics of the multi-level governance framework have not examined implementation structures properly, but have focused on regional influence. They conduct a comparative analysis of the Dutch and Danish implementations of the European Social Fund and the European Regional Development Fund. The findings show that when examining implementation structures it becomes clear that member states are in full control of the re-allocation of EU funds. They show that Denmark and The Netherlands have been able to absorb EU cohesion policy within already existing national implementation structures of labour market policies and regional development. One central theoretical implication of the study is that the focus of studies of any fundamental re-allocation of power resources in cohesion studies should comprise the entire network of implementation rather than the strategies of its individual component actors.