Author (Person) | Forsberg, Tuomas, Herd, Graeme |
---|---|
Series Title | Journal of Contemporary European Studies |
Series Details | Vol.23, No.1, March 2015, p41-57 |
Publication Date | March 2015 |
ISSN | 1478-2804 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: The Ukrainian crisis and Russia's annexation of Crimea marks a new low in Russia–NATO relations. When we examine the relationship between NATO and Russia through the post-Cold War era, we can ask: was the deterioration in relations determined by geopolitical, historical, cultural and identity factors, or could sustainable partnership might have been possible had alternative decisions been taken? We argue that different reasons account for each of the four instances of deterioration in the relationship. Throughout the period some constants can be identified: cooperative rhetoric rarely mirrored reality; a mismatch in expectations, commitments and perceptions torpedoed the prospect of a more stable cooperative partnership; and, a surprising persistence in low-key but significant cooperation can be noted. The article concludes with the observation that dissonance at the heart of NATO–Russia relations is best understood as the consequence of Russia's attempt to navigate its way through a strategic trilemma and divorce signals Russia's failure to square the circle. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2014.1001824 |
Subject Categories | Security and Defence |
Countries / Regions | Europe, Russia |