Author (Person) | Stoyanova-Sieber, Milena |
---|---|
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Series Title | European Competition Journal |
Series Details | Volume 5, Number 3, Pages 721-755 |
Publication Date | September 2009 |
ISSN | 1744-1056 |
Content Type | Journal Article |
Introduction: "The aim of an enforcement system is to create incentives to comply with the law by detecting violations and sanctioning the violators. Sector-specific regulation and competition law enforcement in telecoms are two means towards the attainment of a common goal—effective competition."
"This article will compare sector-specific and competition law remedies and will examine the regulatory configurations in which each of the two regulatory regimes will give the best results (section B). Having analysed the likely challenges for SMP remedies, it will also discuss the potential of number portability (NP) under the USD for enhancement of the state of competition (section C). Remedies taken under a co-regulatory procedure will be presented in section D. Challenges to private enforcement of the competition rules in the telecoms sector will be put forward and respective solutions to possible impediments will be suggested in section E. Section F will outline the predominant standard against which public and private enforcers will define harm from an antitrust violation."
|
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source https://doi.org/10.5235/ecj.v5n3.721 |
Subject Categories | Internal Markets |
Subject Tags | Competition Law | Policy, Telecommunications |
Keywords | Antitrust | Cartels | Dominant Position | Market Abuse |