Author (Corporate) | European Ombudsman |
---|---|
Series Title | Press Release |
Series Details | 26.02.16 |
Publication Date | 26/02/2016 |
Content Type | News |
The case concerns whether the European Commission should have carried out a human rights impact assessment in the context of its negotiations to conclude a free trade agreement with Vietnam. The complainants believed that such an assessment was necessary, whereas the Commission’s position was that it was not necessary since a sustainability impact assessment had already been carried out in 2009 on a proposed EU/ASEAN free trade agreement, which included Vietnam. The Ombudsman's conclusion was that the Commission's failure to carry out a specific human rights impact assessment, in relation to Vietnam, constituted maladministration. In March 2015 she recommended that the Commission should carry out such an assessment without further delay. The Commission refused. It argued that its "non-trade policy instruments" and the human rights clauses in the partnership and cooperation agreement achieved that same purpose. The Ombudsman did not agree and in doing so underlined the features inherent in the human rights impact assessment tool. As the Agreement has been concluded in the meantime, the Ombudsman closed the case with a critical remark. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/cases/decision.faces/en/64308/html.bookmark |
Related Links |
|
Subject Categories | Values and Beliefs |
Countries / Regions | Europe, Southeastern Asia |