Author (Person) | Bauer, Michael W. |
---|---|
Series Title | Journal of Common Market Studies |
Series Details | Vol.40, No.3, September 2002, p381-400 |
Publication Date | September 2002 |
ISSN | 0021-9886 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: The principal-agent model (PAM) has produced valid hypotheses for conceptualising actor relationships, but its disadvantage - as an economic concept transferred from the field of industrial organisation and the theory of the firm to that of European integration - is often overlooked. This article argues that, when applying the concept, researchers interested in the empirical analysis of the EU policy process should be aware of some sensitive points concerning both 'internal' consistency and 'external' theoretical constraints. Drawing on a case study of the EU poverty programmes, three behavioural patterns - 'discourse framing', 'lobby sponsoring' and 'stretching' - are identified. These all indicate how the uncritical use of PAM may lead to faulty judgements about the actual degree of Commission autonomy in EU public policy-making. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/ |
Subject Categories | Employment and Social Affairs, Politics and International Relations |