Informal meeting of Defence Ministers, Sintra, and launch of the Political and Security Committee, February-March 2000

Author (Person)
Publisher
Series Title
Series Details 4.3.00
Publication Date 04/03/2000
Content Type , ,

The Defence Ministers of the European Community met, informally, in Sintra, Portugal on the 28th February 2000. The aim of the meeting was to examine, according to the decision made at the European Council, Helsinki, 10-11.12.99, the progress reached regarding the implementation of the necessary means to provide Europe with defence capacity and common security.

One significant manifestation of the progress achieved in the development of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) was the occasion of the official launch, and first meeting, in Brussels on 1 March 2000 of the interim Political and Security Committee.

Background

Traditionally, 'defence' has not been seen as an area of the EU's competence, although there have been European initiatives in this area over a long period of time. One of the earliest was a proposal in 1950 to create a European Defence Community. In the event the plan did not succeed. Subsequent European integration initiatives were more directed in the economic sphere and bore fruit in the establishment of the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1957.

Defence co-operation amongst European countries was, nevertheless, a feature of the post-war world. In 1949 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) had been established with the following member countries: Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, The United Kingdom, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Norway, Portugal, the United States and Canada. Subsequently, the following countries joined: Greece and Turkey (1952), West Germany (1955) and Spain (1982). France withdrew from the NATO integrated military structure in 1966, as did Spain in 1986, although both remained members of NATO.

The role of the United States in preserving peace and stability in Europe (as well as providing the basis for economic development) has been a significant factor in the last fifty years. Equally, there have calls for the European countries to do more for themselves on their 'own' continent. This initially manifested itself in the development of the Western European Union (WEU), set up in 1955 with the following members: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Subsequently the following countries joined: Portugal and Spain (1990) and Greece (1995). Since 1992 the WEU has introduced new categories of membership such as Associate Members, Observers and Associate Partners. In total, currently there are twenty eight European nations associated with the Western European Union.

In some ways the WEU has been a largely forgotten organisation, overshadowed by the Euro-Atlanticist might of NATO. Nevertheless, the 1990s saw the beginnings of a number of attempts to bring the WEU more within the sphere of the European Union. A Declaration annexed to the Treaty on European Union, 1992, for example, stated that the WEU should be built up as 'the defence component of the European Union'. The Treaty of Amsterdam, 1997 says that the WEU will support the EU 'in framing the defence aspects of the common foreign and security policy'.

As the decade progressed further initiatives have been taken to develop a greater degree of cooperation amongst European countries in defence matters. One significant milestone was the signing of the Declaration on European Defence, signed at the British-French Summit, St Malo, 3-4 December 1998 which included the statement:

The European Union needs to be in a position to play its full role on the international stage. This means making a reality of the Treaty of Amsterdam, which will provide the essential basis for action by the Union. It will be important to achieve full and rapid implementation of the Amsterdam provisions on CFSP. This includes the responsibility of the European Council to decide on the progressive framing of a common defence policy in the framework of CFSP….

To this end, the Union must have the capacity for autonomous action, backed up by credible military forces, the means to decide to use them, and a readiness to do so, in order to respond to international crises.

A further, if less positive, milestone was the Balkan crisis in 1999 when there was considerable criticism of the European contribution to the military conflict 'in its own backyard'.

All these factors seemed to spur the EU leaders at the European Council in Helsinki in December 1999 to take a number of important decisions in relation to the development of the defence and security dimension at an EU level. The Presidency Conclusions included the following statement:

The European Council adopts the two Presidency progress reports on developing the Union's military and non-military crisis management capability as part of a strengthened common European policy on security and defence.

The Union will contribute to international peace and security in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter. The Union recognises the primary responsibility of the United Nations Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.

The European Council underlines its determination to develop an autonomous capacity to take decisions and, where NATO as a whole is not engaged, to launch and conduct EU-led military operations in response to international crises. This process will avoid unnecessary duplication and does not imply the creation of a European army.

Building on the guidelines established at the Cologne European Council and on the basis of the Presidency's reports, the European Council has agreed in particular the following:

  • cooperating voluntarily in EU-led operations, Member States must be able, by 2003, to deploy within 60 days and sustain for at least 1 year military forces of up to 50,000-60,000 persons capable of the full range of Petersberg Declaration tasks
  • new political and military bodies and structures will be established within the Council to enable the Union to ensure the necessary political guidance and strategic direction to such operations, while respecting the single institutional framework
  • modalities will be developed for full consultation, cooperation and transparency between the EU and NATO, taking into account the needs of all EU Member States
  • appropriate arrangements will be defined that would allow, while respecting the Union's decision-making autonomy, non-EU European NATO members and other interested States to contribute to EU military crisis management
  • a non-military crisis management mechanism will be established to coordinate and make more effective the various civilian means and resources, in parallel with the military ones, at the disposal of the Union and the Member States.

The European Council asks the incoming Presidency, together with the Secretary-General/High Representative, to carry work forward in the General Affairs Council on all aspects of the reports as a matter of priority, including conflict prevention and a committee for civilian crisis management. The incoming Presidency is invited to draw up a first progress report to the Lisbon European Council* and an overall report to be presented to the Feira European Council+ containing appropriate recommendations and proposals, as well as an indication of whether or not Treaty amendment is judged necessary. The General Affairs Council is invited to begin implementing these decisions by establishing as of March 2000 the agreed interim bodies and arrangements within the Council, in accordance with the current Treaty provisions.

* 23-24 March 2000
+ 19-20 June 2000

The present

The informal meeting of EU Defence Ministers that took place in Sintra on 28 February 2000 agreed that as from 1 March 2000 the interim bodies that have been established to prepare for the future military structures could start operating from the Council of the European Union building in Brussels. Ministers also agreed to the holding of a 'Force Generation Conference', probably at the end of 2000, to plan for the creation of a military force of approximately 50,000 to 60,000 personnel. A Press Release from the Portuguese EU Presidency gives further details.

A further milestone in the development of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy took place in Brussels on 1 March 2000 with the first meeting of the interim Political and Security Committee. This is a key step in the process of the EU creating the bodies that will provide political guidance and strategic direction, in parallel with the work of the military bodies mentioned above. Dr Javier Solana, the High Representative of the European Union for CFSP gave a speech at the launch of the Political and Security Committee.

There are a number of speeches given by key European figures in recent months that provide much further information on the developing European Defence and Security Dimension / Identity:

Links to some of the recent relevant legislative activity includes:

399D0321
1999/321/CFSP: Council Decision of 10 May 1999 concerning the practical arrangements for the participation of all Member States in tasks pursuant to Article 17(2) of the Treaty on European Union for which the Union avails itself of the WEU
Official Journal L123, 13.05/99 p14-17

399D0404
1999/404/CFSP: Council Decision of 10 May 1999 concerning the arrangements for enhanced cooperation between the European Union and the Western European Union
Official Journal L153, 19.06.99 p01-27
Legislation adopted in 2000 relating to the setting up of the interim Committees was not available through EUR-LEX at time of compilation of this feature.

Further information within European Sources Online:

European Sources Online: European Voice
21.1.99: Call for defence shake-up
14.10.99: EU sees double over foreign affairs
11.11.99: EU to take key steps to boost its military muscle
18.11.99: 15 November General Affairs Council/Defence ministers

Further information can be seen in these external links:
(long-term access cannot be guaranteed)

European Parliament: Fact Sheets: Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)
Foreign policy: aims, instruments and achievements
Defending human rights
Common security policy and the WEU

North Atlantic Treaty Organisation

NATO Parliamentary Assembly
See, in particular:
An International Secretariat Background Brief on The European Security and Defence Identity / Policy (ESDI/P), February 2000

Western European Union

Western European Union: Assembly

Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)

United States: State Department:
Adapting to the New Security Environment in Europe
 
United Kingdom: Ministry of Defence:
European defence and the European Defence and Security Identity
 
BBC News Online:
9.12.99: EU leaders consider new European army
10.12.99: Eurocorps: A truly European defence force?
5.2.00: US criticises European defence spending

Ian Thomson
Executive Editor, European Sources Online
Compiled 4 March 2000

Background and reporting on the week's main stories in the European Union and the wider Europe.

Subject Categories