| Author (Corporate) | European Parliament: European Parliamentary Research Service |
|---|---|
| Publisher | EU |
| Series Title | Study |
| Series Details | July 2017 |
| Publication Date | July 2017 |
| ISBN | 978-92-846-1267-3 |
| Content Type | Report |
|
Please note: Each EPRS Study is assigned a DOI (digital object identifier), which is a safe and long term way of ensuring a hyperlink to the full text of this report. However, when ESO creates this record, on occasion the DOI still has not been activated by the EU Bookshop. If you find the source url hyperlink does not work please use the alternative location hyperlink listed as a related url.Abstract: The study compares the revised and signed text of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EUVFTA) and the >EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (EUSFTA) in respect of important procedural aspects relating to investor State dispute settlement. The findings are juxtaposed to the procedural rules governing the preliminary reference procedure and direct action (action for annulment) before the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as the individual application before the European Court of Human Rights. In doing so, it provides a tool and manual to evaluate the EU’s todays and future progress in reforming the international investment law regime. By outlining key features of the procedural frameworks governing two international courts, some ‘tried and tested’ concepts as source of inspiration for the possible design of a ‘multilateral investment court’ might be found. |
|
| Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.publications.europa.eu/10.2861/813157 |
| Related Links |
|
| Subject Categories | Trade |
| Countries / Regions | Europe |
