| Author (Person) | Ginter, Carri, Härginen, Kadri, Sõrm, Mario |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Sweet & Maxwell |
| Series Title | Public Procurement Law Review |
| Series Details | Volume 30, Number 3, Pages 117-130 |
| Publication Date | 2020 |
| ISSN | 0963-8245 |
| Content Type | Journal Article |
|
Abstract: For almost 20 years the ECJ considered in-house contracts as not procurement contracts but doing it yourself. Authors study the codification process of in-house and demonstrate that the process was imperfect. As a result what used to be a rule, might have become an exception. Accordingly researchers should take even a more critical look on the procurement directives. The results of this research demonstrate that a comparative analysis of the procurement directives shows strong discrepancies in the wording, logic and structure, creating a myriad of legal issues to be analysed. |
|
| Source Link |
Link to Main Source
https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF959EA2088E111EA93B1F1B249F65DE0/View/FullText.html
Alternative sources
|
| Subject Categories | Law |
| Subject Tags | Public Procurement |
| Countries / Regions | Estonia |
| International Organisations | European Union [EU] |
