Author (Person) | Stojanov, Dragoljub |
---|---|
Publisher | Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences |
Series Title | Working Papers: Institute for World Economics |
Series Details | No. 149, December 2004 |
Publication Date | December 2004 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
This paper sets out to compare some aspects of the transition packages in two seemingly incomparable countries, in search of similarities and dissimilarities, and hints as to where Bosnia and Herzegovina may have gone wrong. Particular attention is paid to the macroeconomics part of the transition package, together with assessment of privatization and the role of FDI. The institutional aspect of the transition, particularly in Bosnia and Herzegovina, is treated in thesecond part. Hungary, seen here as a success story of transition, joined the EU on May 1, 2004. However, any similarity that Hungary’s transition policy and measures appears to have to the Washington Consensus will not bear more than cursory scrutiny. Privatization was conducted under wise government policy. Foreign-trade policy and foreign-trade liberalization formed a gradual, well-executed process. Hungary used exchange-rate policy to support the competitiveness of domestic and transnational corporations on the world market. Wage and income policy were supportive to economic growth and The transition package in Bosnia and Herzegovina is entirely free-market driven. The state has been excluded from the economy on ideological |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.vki.hu/workingpapers/wp-149.pdf |
Countries / Regions | Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary |