Author (Person) | Busby, Helen |
---|---|
Series Title | European Law Review |
Series Details | Vol.33, No.6, December 2008, p803-842 |
Publication Date | December 2008 |
ISSN | 0307-5400 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) plays an ambiguous role in the European Union's legal order. Seen from the perspective of the on-going 'democratic deficit' debate, EU regulation of biotechnology is problematic. The prize of European competitiveness mandates EU-level law and policy-making to enhance the expansion of the biotechnology industry. Yet a widespread citizen consensus for such expansion is lacking. The article shows that the EGE is significantly influential in bolstering the acceptance of emerging biotechnologies, by supplying authoritative normative endorsement to legislation and administrative activity that supports the activities of market actors within the biotechnology industry. But at the same time, the constitutional status of the EGE is at best 'grey', given that it has no firm basis in the European Union's constituent Treaties, or the legislative structures developed to enhance the legitimacy, transparency, accountability, representativeness, effectiveness and efficiency of the European Union's legislative and executive decision-making. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/ |
Subject Categories | Culture, Education and Research, Values and Beliefs |
Countries / Regions | Europe |