Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament

Author (Person) ,
Publisher
Series Title
Series Details Volume 15, Number 4, Pages 496-520
Publication Date December 2014
ISSN 1465-1165
Content Type

Abstract:

The European Parliament (EP) has one of the highest proportions of women in its ranks, with over a third in 2009. Although previous research has pointed to the use of proportional representation (PR) in European elections as ‘friendlier’ to women, few have looked at differences in the types of PR rules in use in each country.

In this article, we argue that the conventional wisdom according to which institutional design—the choice of electoral rules—should shape the composition of the EP does not hold, and suggest that the well-documented empirical connection between electoral rules and descriptive representation might in fact be an endogenous rather than a causal relationship.

Source Link Link to Main Source https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1465116514527179
Related Links
Commentary and Analysis
APSA: Annual Meeting Paper: Nominating Women for EP Elections: Exploring the Role of Political Parties’ Recruitment Procedures (2014) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2455671
LSE: EUROPP Blog, 20/01/2015: Why the European Parliament has a better gender balance than national parliaments http://bit.ly/1B9O9RK

Subject Categories
Subject Tags ,
International Organisations