Author (Person) | Heliskoski, Joni, Leino, Päivi |
---|---|
Publisher | Kluwer Law International |
Series Title | Common Market Law Review |
Series Details | Volume 43, Number 3, Pages 735-781 |
Publication Date | June 2006 |
ISSN | 0165-0750 |
Content Type | Journal Article |
Abstract: On 30 May 2001, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (hereinafter Regulation No 1049/2001) was adopted in the European Union. The overall purpose of the Regulation, as stated in the Preamble, is to give the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents and, in so doing, to contribute to openness and transparency in the functioning of the Union's institutions. The purpose of the present contribution is to assess whether a corresponding shift towards a genuinely constitutional right has taken place in the case law of the Court of First Instance (hereinafter CFI) interpreting Regulation No 1049/2001. If, at a more general level and in the every-day institutional practice, the Regulation has contributed to a change towards greater openness and transparency, the conclusion of the present analysis is that the CFI, unfortunately, has chosen another direction. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source https://kluwerlawonline-com.abc.cardiff.ac.uk/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/43.3/COLA2006032 |
Subject Categories | Law |
Subject Tags | EU Law, Information Society |
Keywords | Decision-Making | Policy-Making, Openness | Transparency |
International Organisations | European Union [EU] |