Conscientious Objection to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: International Human Rights Standards and European Law and Practice

Author (Person) ,
Series Title
Series Details Vol.19, No.3, June 2012, p231-256
Publication Date June 2012
ISSN 0929-0273
Content Type

The Italian Ministry of Health reported that in 2008 nearly 70% of gynaecologists in Italy refuse to perform abortions on moral grounds. It found that between 2003 and 2007 the number of gynaecologists invoking conscientious objection in their refusal to perform an abortion rose from 58.7 percent to 69.2 percent.

Italy is not alone in Europe, for example, the practice is prevalent in Poland, Slovakia, and is growing in the United Kingdom.

Abstract:

The practice of conscientious objection often arises in the area of individuals refusing to fulfill compulsory military service requirements and is based on the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as protected by national, international and regional human rights law.

The practice of conscientious objection also arises in the field of health care, when individual health care providers or institutions refuse to provide certain health services based on religious, moral or philosophical objections. The use of conscientious objection by health care providers to reproductive health care services, including abortion, contraceptive prescriptions, and prenatal tests, among other services is a growing phenomena throughout Europe.

However, despite recent progress from the European Court of Human Rights on this issue (RR v. Poland, 2011), countries and international and regional bodies generally have failed to comprehensively and effectively regulate this practice, denying many women reproductive health care services they are legally entitled to receive.

This article outlines the international and regional human rights obligations and medical standards on this issue, and highlights some of the main gaps in these standards. It illustrates how European countries regulate or fail to regulate conscientious objection and how these regulations are working in practice, including examples of jurisprudence from national level courts and cases before the European Court of Human Rights.

Finally, the article will provide recommendations to national governments as well as to international and regional bodies on how to regulate conscientious objection so as to both respect the practice of conscientious objection while protecting individual’s right to reproductive health care.

Source Link Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180912X639116
Subject Categories
Countries / Regions