BSE: French ban on British beef lifted, October 2002

Author (Person)
Publisher
Series Title
Series Details 8.10.02
Publication Date 08/10/2002
Content Type , ,

On Wednesday 2 October 2002, three years after it should have been lifted, the French Prime Minister finally announced his intention to lift the ban on the import of British beef into France.

The European Commission imposed a ban on all exports of British beef on 27 March 1996, after the United Kingdom identified a new variant form of CJD (the human form of the disease caused by exposure to BSE). This ban was progressively lifted from June 1998 and completely lifted on 1 August 1999. Since then British beef could be exported under the DBES system (date-based export scheme) which sets strict conditions (for example only de-boned meat of bovines between 6-30 months of age complying with very detailed requirements and originating in dedicated meat plants). France, however, continued to ban British beef, despite the objections of both the European Commission and the United Kingdom government.

Since 1996 about 4.5 million cattle in the United Kingdom have been slaughtered to prevent the spread of Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) at a cost of £1.4 billion in compensation to farmers and £575 million for disposal of carcases. Since vCJD was identified in 1995, 110 people have died. The beef industry in the UK has suffered huge losses from which it has still not recovered. Several European countries, in which there had previously been little known incidence of BSE, have recorded a steadily increasing number of cases. While these are never likely to be as great as those in the UK, this has sparked a renewed sense of unease amongst European consumers about the safety of beef and calls for tighter controls on what is fed to cows and stricter checking procedures for discovering cattle with the disease. UK beef exports still remain at a fraction of their pre-1996 levels. Before the first ban on British beef in March 1996, farmers were exporting 274,000 tonnes of beef a year, with a value of about £520m. France accounted for nearly half of Britain's beef exports - about 100,000 tonnes worth £240m a year. However, restrictions imposed after the ban was lifted in 1999 meant total British exports fell to only 500 tonnes a year.

French position

France maintained its ban, after 1 August 1999, on the import of British beef into France, citing claims by its own food safety agency that the risk of human infection could not be excluded. The French food safety agency, Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA), was only established in April 1999 and is an independent organisation whose views, under French law, must be taken into account by the relevant ministries of agriculture, health and consumer affairs. AFSSA has continued to express its doubts about the effectiveness of the measures in the UK and the EU to control BSE and its concern about the possible harmful effect for consumers. In particular, it complained about testing for BSE in the UK being limited to certain categories of cattle and the lack of a traceability system in the EU. On the basis of AFSSA's opinion France refused to lift its ban and simply authorised the transit of British beef and veal on its territory.

France wanted Britain to introduce mandatory testing of all cattle older than 30 months to allow a more accurate picture to be drawn of the status of BSE, of which there have been more than 180,000 cases in the UK. Only animals destined for food production were tested, although the UK also tested random samples of other cattle. Jean Glavany, the French agriculture minister, referred to a recent report from the European Commission's Food and Veterinary Office that cast doubt on the true picture of BSE in the UK. The report had concluded: 'As active surveillance is practically not performed, it has to be assumed that the BSE incidence for Great Britain has to be seen with a considerable degree of uncertainty.'

Action by the European Commission

The European Commission reacted promptly to the French refusal to lift its ban on British beef and started the established infringement procedure (letters, formal notices, reasoned opinions etc.).

10 September 1999:      The Commission wrote a letter to the French Republic in which it expressed its surprise at the referral to the Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA) in connection with the implementation of Commission Decisions and asked the French Republic to comply rapidly with those decisions.
1 October 1999:      The French Republic forwarded to the Commission the opinion issued by the AFSSA on 30 September 1999 and requested that the opinion and the data on which it was based be examined by the European Commission's Scientific Steering Committee (SSC).
28 - 29 October 1999:      The Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) examined that opinion and concluded that the measures adopted by the United Kingdom made the risk to human health from the United Kingdom DBES at least comparable to that in the other Member States.
15 November 1999:      The UK delivered a letter to the European Commission requesting that legal action be taken against France for its refusal to lift the ban on British beef.
16 November 1999:      The European Commission decided to initiate formal legal proceedings against France, although still hoping that a negotiated settlement could still be reached.
17 November 1999:      The Commission sent the French Republic a letter of formal notice stating in particular that, by refusing to allow United Kingdom beef conforming to Community requirements to be marketed in its territory after 1 August 1999, the French Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law.
24 November 1999:      The French and United Kingdom authorities and the Commission drew up a protocol of understanding. According to that protocol, the French authorities were satisfied with the clarifications provided by the United Kingdom authorities and the Commission with regard to traceability of products in the United Kingdom and on-the-spot controls in that Member State.
1 December 1999:      The French Government requested, by letter, a one-week extension for replying to the letter of formal notice, in order to enable it to submit the protocol of understanding to the AFSSA.
8 December 1999:      The French Prime Minister's press office issued a press release announcing that 'France is not currently able to lift the ban on British beef and veal'.
9 December 1999:      The French Government replied, by letter, to the Commission's letter of formal notice.
14 December 1999:      The Commission sent a reasoned opinion to the French Republic referring to the press release of 8 December 1999 and calling on it to adopt, within five working days, the measures necessary in order for it to comply with its Community obligations.
16 December 1999:      The Commission sent a second reasoned opinion, which also set a time-limit for compliance of five working days. At the request of the French Republic that time-limit was extended to 30 December 1999.
29 December 1999:      The French Government replied by letter to the reasoned opinion. It pointed out that, under French law, the AFSSA had to be consulted before any amendment of the order of 28 October 1998. According to the opinions given by the AFSSA, serious doubts remained as to the risks presented by products subject to the DBES.
30 December 1999:      In view of the French Republic's reply to the reasoned opinion, the Commission decided to take legal action.

Judgment of the Court of Justice

After repeated warnings, the European Commission referred the matter to the Court of Justice, but it a was full year before the judgment was delivered. Case 1/00 (Commission v. France) was registered with the Court on December 2000 and hearings began in June 2001. The Commission's lawyers said France's 'simple blanket refusal' to respect an EU decision lifting the ban was 'brazen and utterly unjustified'. Lawyers for the French government told the court that the case was of 'crucial importance' for human and animal health throughout the EU, where more than 100 probable or confirmed cases of new variant CJD have been recorded. France also argued that the Commission did not allow it time to respond to legal warnings and failed to give its concerns a serious hearing.

The French Government claimed that the conditions for lifting the ban were not met because:

  • (i) the DBES did not take account of new data such as the discovery of a suspected case of BSE;
  • (ii) United Kingdom beef and veal did not comply with the conditions of the DBES; and
  • (iii) there was no system for tracing products subject to the DBES and the Member States had refused to set up such a system, although this is a fundamental condition of the DBES.

Advocate General J. Mischo delivered his Opinion on 20 September 2001. He proposed that the Court should 'declare that, by prohibiting the direct import from the United Kingdom of products eligible under the date-based export scheme, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations'. The French government could not refuse meat imported directly from the UK. However, he said France could be justified in prohibiting British beef imported via another country, because of the lack of an EU-wide tracing system for beef in 1999, when British beef exports resumed. The Judgment of the Court, based on this Opinion, was given on 13 December 2001. The full texts of the Opinion and Judgment are available on the Court's website. There is also a summary of the judgment in case C-1/00 in Proceedings of the Court of Justice, no 33/01 (week 10 -14 December 2001). In effect, the court found that the French ban breached EU rules, but concluded that France had some justification for its concerns because the EU did not have a reliable tracing system in place when it allowed British exports to resume in 1999.

Further Infringement proceedings

The French government refused to take a decision until it had studied the judgment and analysed the latest state of knowledge on BSE and measures being undertaken in the UK. 'The decision will be based on the respect of the precautionary principle which has consistently guided the government's action in its public health policy.'

Article 228 of the EU Treaty established the legal procedure to follow if a Member State does not comply with a Court of Justice judgment. After a letter of formal notice, a reasoned opinion is addressed to the Member State concerned. If non-compliance continues, the Commission may apply to the Court of Justice to impose a fine. The Court is free to decide the level of the fine and is not bound by any amount suggested by the Commission.

On 20 March 2002 a Letter of formal notice was sent to France for non-compliance with the Court judgment, but it became clear that France was not prepared to take any decision about accepting imports of British beef until after the French general election in June. The European Commission said that unless France reversed its position, it would consider reopening infringement proceedings and ask the European Court of Justice to order the fines to be paid.

On 26 June the European Commission sent France a final warning (Reasoned opinion ) that it was in breach of European Union law by maintaining its restrictions on UK beef. France had 15 days to end the ban. If it failed to do so, the Commission would refer the matter back to the court, and ask it to impose a daily fine on France until the ban is lifted. The French President then asked the French food safety agency for a further report.

On 16 July the European Commission referred the matter back to the Court of Justice and asked for a financial penalty to be imposed on France for failing to comply with the order to lift its ban on British beef. France was still adamant that it had no immediate plans to lift it, even though it faced the possibility of a €158,000 daily fine for disregarding the ruling of the Court of Justice.

Ban lifted

On 20 September 2002 AFSSA announced that renewed imports would not endanger French consumers by exposing them to mad cow disease. It said that 'henceforth, the possibility of importing British meat would not call into question the level of safety currently guaranteed to the French consumer'. On 2 October, the French government finally announced that it would lift the ban.

The National Farmers' Union of the UK, which was pursuing its own European court action against the French ban, was outraged that France could continue to defy EU law for so long, without any penalty being imposed.

'The ease with which France has avoided financial penalty for its illegal ban on British beef has exposed a major flaw in the European single market, the NFU said today. NFU President Ben Gill said: 'Our worst fears that France will escape being punished by the European judicial system have come true.' Mr Gill will be seeking to meet with the European Commissioner for Consumer Protection David Byrne to discuss the current position and the urgent need for reform in this area. France was the only EU country that continued to block imports of British beef following the lifting of the European Commission BSE ban in August 1999. On Wednesday (2 October) the French Prime Minister finally announced his intention to lift the ban. In July, the European Commission called for France to be fined £100,000 a day for maintaining its illegal ban and referred the matter once more to the European Court of Justice. But because the ban was lifted before the legal proceedings were completed, the French will escape punishment. Mr Gill said: 'We are extremely disappointed that the EU judicial system is not robust enough to deal with this matter. The European Court of Justice simply does not provide the appropriate remedy to this type of issue. Lessons must now be learnt and the system must be changed to prevent a repeat of this injustice. The integrity of the European Commission's role in these important trade matters is at stake.'
NFU Press Release 4 October 2002

Further information within European Sources Online:

European Sources Online: In Focus:
BSE in Europe, April 2002
The BSE Crisis, December 2000
 
European Sources Online: European Voice:
18.07.02: France to keep UK beef ban despite threat of heavy fines
 
European Sources Online: Financial Times:
27.06.02: France facing daily fines over British beef ban
18.07.02: France faces daily fine for banning British beef
21.09.02: France moves step closer to lifting British beef ban
03.10.02: France heads off sanctions and lifts ban on British beef

Further information can be seen in these external links:
(long-term access cannot be guaranteed)

EU Institutions

European Commission:
 
  Press and Communication Service
  15.11.00: Main EU legislation on BSE
  20.03.02: Letter of formal notice sent to France for non-compliance of Court judgment on British beef. IP/02/446
  26.06.02: Reasoned opinion sent to France for non-compliance with Court judgment on British beef. IP/02/938
  02.10.02: David Byrne welcomes the lifting of British beef embargo by France. IP/02/1419
 
  DG Health and Consumer Protection
  Homepage
    BSE
    Frequently asked questions about BSE tests, 19 December 2000
    Chronological overview of Community legislation concerning BSE, 30 January 2001
    Frequently asked questions about BSE, 6 April 2001
    Number of cases of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy 1987 - 2001
    Number of cases of BSE 1987-2002 (in French), 28 February 2002
 
European Court of Justice:
 
Proceedings, week 10-14 December 2001
Press releases - cases
  13.12.01: The Court declares unlawful France's refusal to lift the ban on correctly marked or labelled imports of British beef and veal from 30 December 1999. Press release 68/01
Case C-1/00 Commission v. France:
  Opinion by Advocate-General Mischo, 20 September 2001
  Judgment, 13 December 2001
 
National Organisations
 
United Kingdom: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:
Homepage
  Animal health and welfare
  BSE
  Publications
  The Government's Interim Response to the Report of the BSE Inquiry. February 2001
  The Government's Response to the Report of the BSE Inquiry. 2001
  Review of the origin of BSE. 2001
 
United Kingdom: The BSE Inquiry:
Homepage
  Report of the Inquiry into BSE and variant CJD in the United Kingdom. October 2000
 
United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency:
Homepage
  FSA guide to BSE
  BSE Controls Review
  BSE News Digest
  Worldwide BSE figures (by country)
 
France: Ministère de l'Agriculture, de l'Alimentation, de la Pêche et des Affaires Rurales [Ministry of Agriculture, Food, Fisheries and Rural Affairs]:
Homepage
  ESB Info [in French]
 
France: Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments (AFSSA) [Food Safety Agency]:
Homepage [in French]
  News [in French]
  Dossier: Encephalopathies spongiformes subaigues transmissibles [in French]
  Dossier: Evaluation des risques alimentaires en Europe [in French]

Miscellaneous Organisations

National Farmers Union - NFU:
Homepage
  02.10.02: Bon appetit! French lift illegal beef ban
  04.10.02: French ban fine decision exposes flaw in European law

News Organisations

BBC News Online:
13.12.01: Q&A: The French ban on British beef
26.06.02: France ordered to lift beef ban
12.07.02: France breaks beef ban deadline
17.07.02: France faces fines over beef ban
20.09.02: French food agency backs British beef
20.09.02: Farmers wait for end of French ban
20.09.02: UK urges France to end beef ban
25.09.02: The cost of the beef crisis
03.10.02: Doubt over French beef ban fine
03.10.02: France lifts beef ban

Further and subsequent information on the subject of this In Focus can be found by an 'Advanced Search' in European Sources Online by inserting 'BSE' or 'beef' in the keyword field.

Freda Carroll
KnowEurope Researcher
Compiled: 8 October 2002

On Wednesday 2 October 2002, three years after it should have been lifted, the French Prime Minister finally announced his intention to lift the ban on the import of British beef into France.

Subject Categories