Author (Person) | Schäfer, Armin |
---|---|
Series Title | MPIfG Working Papers |
Series Details | No 5, September 2004 |
Publication Date | 2004 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) has received much attention in the recent EU-literature. The predominant view claims that the OMC is not only a new but also an effective policy-making instrument. This paper raises doubts about both claims by offering a comparison of soft law policy coordination in three international organizations. More specifically, this paper compares the European Employment Strategy - which was the first use of the OMC - to the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines of the EU, the OECD Economic Surveys, and the IMF Article IV Consultations. Based on expert interviews, it seeks to demonstrate that these procedures are forms of multilateral surveillance that do not differ in kind. Such a comparative analysis of the OMC refutes claims to its novelty. Having compared the four procedures, a more general model of multilateral surveillance consisting of six elements is generated that facilitates further comparisons. This paper concludes that governments select voluntarist procedures mainly to secure their own competencies rather than to realize common goals. Effective problem-solving is therefore not necessarily the dominant objective of soft law. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/workpap/wp04-5/wp04-5.html |
Subject Categories | Economic and Financial Affairs, Employment and Social Affairs, Politics and International Relations |
Countries / Regions | Europe |