Author (Person) | Zerka, Pawel |
---|---|
Publisher | European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) |
Series Title | Commentary |
Series Details | 31.01.18 |
Publication Date | 31/01/2018 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog, News |
Background + Article 7 Rule of law procedure Judicial reforms in Poland meant that the country's judiciary was now under the political control of the ruling majority. In the absence of judicial independence, serious questions were raised about the effective application of EU law. In addition, the Commission decided to take the next step in its infringement procedure against Poland for breaches of EU law by the Law on the Ordinary Courts Organisation, referring Poland to the Court of Justice of the European Union. Whilst taking these unprecedented measures, the Commission maintained its offer for a constructive dialogue to remedy the situation. In response, the Polish government said it regretted the development, which it felt was political not legal. It would put an unnecessary burden on mutual relations between Poland and the European Commission. It argued that the recently introduced changes to laws reforming the system of justice in Poland accommodated the expectations of the Commission. Poland was ready to defend its claims at the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) as an independent and impartial judicial body. In a separate but related development Polish President Andrzej Duda signed into law on the 20 December 2017 two bills reforming the country's key judicial bodies. The two bills reformed the Supreme Court (SN) and the National Judicial Council (KRS). The European Commission had already referred these laws to the ECJ. + New Polish Government of December 2017-January 2018 |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_europes_defining_choice_on_poland |
Related Links |
|
Countries / Regions | Poland |