Author (Person) | Glencross, Andrew |
---|---|
Series Title | Journal of European Integration |
Series Details | Vol.38, No.5, June 2016, p497-509 |
Publication Date | July 2016 |
ISSN | 0703-6337 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: This paper examines the actions of the European Council during the Eurozone crisis through the lens of political constitutionalism. This analysis examines the role of political inputs in shaping the EU constitutional developments, whether supranational or intergovernmental, to demonstrate the ‘legitimacy paradox’ of new intergovernmentalism. That is, the European Council claimed the electoral legitimacy to rescue the euro, but in doing so opened up new avenues for contesting EU legitimacy, notably in relation to national budgetary decision-making. For unlike with supranational constitutional agency, the European Council has the means to politicise its actions. However, the strategy taken during the sovereign debt crisis is shown to be one of depoliticisation to prevent the domestic contestation of EMU reform. At the same time, paradoxically, the politics of macroeconomic policy has become Europeanised with the active participation of EU supranational actors. Since EMU reform is dependent on supranational enforcement of EMU rules, the new intergovernmentalism faces political contestation that previous, supranational EU constitutional development did not. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1178250 |
Subject Categories | Politics and International Relations |
Countries / Regions | Europe |