International Justice and the Prevention of Atrocity

Kenya’s President Uhuru Kenyatta has become the first serving head of state to come before the International Criminal Court (ICC) where he faces charges of crimes against humanity. The case in The Hague - which faces possible collapse amid claims the Kenyan government is withholding evidence - could test the limits of international justice.

Meanwhile atrocities apparently committed in Syria by the Assad regime and rebel groups including Islamic State seem beyond the reach of the ICC after Russia and China vetoed a UN Security Council resolution to give the Court jurisdiction.

Are the ideals of international justice out of touch with the realities of global power politics? How far is the effort to hold war criminals accountable compatible with the difficult compromises necessary to bring violent conflicts to an end? How can European countries best pursue the twin goals of ending atrocities and pursuing justice?

These topical questions are explored in a new ECFR report, International Justice and the Prevention of Atrocities, by senior policy fellow Anthony Dworkin.

The report argues that European countries must develop better coordinated policies on justice and atrocity prevention. Too often decisions on justice are taken in isolation from wider foreign policy goals. This risks putting courts in a position where they may present an obstacle to peace but it also risks leaving courts isolated as countries fail to support their work in practice.

The Conversation, 20.10.14: The International Criminal Court must fix its anti-African image https://theconversation.com/the-international-criminal-court-must-fix-its-anti-african-image-32983

---