Author (Person) | Schillig, Michael |
---|---|
Series Title | European Business Law Review |
Series Details | Vol.25, No.1, February 2014, p67–102 |
Publication Date | February 2014 |
ISSN | 0959-6941 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: This article continues from Part I in the previous Issue of the European Business Law Review. Pursuant to the Commission's draft Directive of 6 June 2012,1 the slowly emerging EU framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firm rests on 'three pillars': (i) preparatory and preventive measures; (ii) early intervention; and (iii) resolution tools and powers. Part I discussed preparation and prevention and early intervention. Part II seeks to provide an overview and critical assessment of the third pillar - resolution tools and powers - within a comparative context, taking into account the recently reformed laws of the United Kingdom and Germany. This comparative approach highlights the differences between the national laws of the two Member States under consideration and allows exploring the extent to which each national law would be compatible with the Proposal if it were to become law in its current form. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/index.php?area=Journals |
Countries / Regions | Europe |