Author (Person) | Alcidi, Cinzia, Gros, Daniel |
---|---|
Publisher | Centre for European Policy Studies [CEPS] |
Series Title | CEPS Policy Briefs |
Series Details | No. 276, 11 July 2012 |
Publication Date | 11/07/2012 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Abstract: Different economic and financial structures require different crisis responses. Different crises also require different tools and resources. The first ‘stage’ of the financial crisis (2007-09) was similar on both sides of the Atlantic, and the response was also quite similar. The second stage of the crisis is unique to the euro area. Increasing financial disintegration within the region has forced the ECB to become the central counterparty for the entire cross-border banking market and to intervene in the sovereign bond market of some stressed countries. The actions undertaken by the European Central Bank (ECB), however, have not always represented the best response, in terms of effectiveness, consistency and transparency. This is especially true for the Securities Markets Programme (SMP): by de facto imposing its absolute seniority during the Greek PSI (private sector involvement), the ECB has probably killed its future effectiveness. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://aei.pitt.edu/35860/1/PB276_DG%2C_CA_%26_AG_Central_Banks.pdf |
Subject Categories | Politics and International Relations |
Countries / Regions | Europe, United States |