Author (Person) | Dyèvre, Arthur |
---|---|
Series Title | European Public Law |
Series Details | Vol.18, No.3, September 2012, p527-548 |
Publication Date | September 2012 |
ISSN | 1354-3725 |
Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
Through successive constitutional reforms over the past two decades, French parliamentarians have gained new rights and instruments to monitor policy-making at EU level and to exert tighter scrutiny over the executive branch. Yet the more structural and long-standing obstacles to the reparliamentarization of EU issues have not been removed, which explains why the reforms have failed to deliver the hoped-for Europeanization of parliamentary debates. While some progress has undoubtedly been made - notably with respect to MPs' access to information and expertise on EU legislative proposals - Parliament's overall influence in EU matters remains low and the innovations introduced by the Lisbon Treaty are unlikely to bring about any significant change to this state of affairs. |
|
Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/index.php?area=Journals |
Countries / Regions | Europe, France |