| Author (Person) | Ringsmose, Jens |
|---|---|
| Series Title | European Security |
| Series Details | Vol.18, No. 3, September 2009, p287-304 |
| Publication Date | September 2009 |
| ISSN | 0966-2839 |
| Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
|
Abstract: At the Riga Summit in November 2006, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) declared the NATO Response Force (NRF) a fully operational capability. Yet only 8 months later - and behind closed doors - the Alliance's military authorities rescinded the declaration as it became increasingly clear that member states were unwilling to make the necessary commitments to the force. To this day, the force has been a qualified failure: while many allies have benefited from participating in the NRF, lack of concrete troop commitments and disagreement as to the force's operational role have largely eroded its credibility. This could change with the allies' recent adoption of a revised NRF-construct. However, as NATO is still in a state of strategic confusion, the NRF is likely to continue to be different things to different nations. |
|
| Source Link | http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/ |
| Subject Categories | Security and Defence |
| Countries / Regions | Europe |
