Author (Person) | Bower, Helen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Publisher | ProQuest Information and Learning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series Title | In Focus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series Details | 2.12.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Date | 02/12/2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Content Type | News, Overview, Topic Guide | In Focus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A compromise deal on the labelling of genetically modified food or animal feed was agreed by agriculture ministers from across the EU Member States at a meeting of the Agriculture Council in Brussels on 28 November 2002. The proposal on the labelling and traceability of GMOs aims to provide better information for European consumers but still requires endorsement at the Environment Council on 9 December 2002 and support from the European Parliament before it can be adopted. The agreement, said by Greenpeace to 'offer the world's strictest and most comprehensive regulations for labelling of GM food and feed', lays out three key measures to be introduced across the European Union in 2003. They are:
The compromise deal was reached by qualified majority voting despite opposition from three Member States. The United Kingdom opposed the proposal because it wanted higher thresholds whilst Austria and Luxembourg voted against it because they argued that the rules were not strict enough. The agreement has also met with mixed reactions from environmental organisations. Greenpeace welcomed the proposal saying:
But Lorenzo Consoli, Greenpeace's EU policy advisor on genetic engineering also added a note of caution saying that the compromise deal failed to introduce a safeguard clause such as that in current EU legislation on GMOs which would allow Member States to enact national bans of approved GM products, based on the precautionary principle, if they were considered to pose a risk to health or the environment. Greenpeace also announced its regret that the Danish proposals aimed at imposing labelling of animal products produced with GM feed, such as meat, milk and eggs had been rejected and called on producers and retailers to provide this information voluntarily through the appropriate labelling on the final product. In a letter to EU environment ministers ahead of their Council meeting in December, the European Environmental Bureau also stated that the proposal would only be acceptable if it was extended to products derived from animals fed on GM feed and if the threshold requiring products to be labelled did not exceed 0.5% This is the figure that the European Parliament called for at its first reading on 3 July 2002. Even if the environment ministers support the agriculture ministers' deal MEPs may not be prepared to give up on the strict thresholds they have campaigned for making it unlikely that the EU moratorium on new GM products will be lifted before mid 2003.
Helen Bower A compromise deal on the labelling of genetically modified food or animal feed was agreed by agriculture ministers from across the EU Member States at a meeting of the Agriculture Council in Brussels on 28 November 2002. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Categories | Business and Industry |